HomeGain Releases 3rd Qtr Pennsylvania Home Prices Survey
Earlier this week, HomeGain, the first website to provide free instant home values, released the national and regional results of our home prices survey of 1,084 HomeGain members. We asked their opinions on the direction of home values and of Obama’s performance as President. On this real estate blog we published the complete national and regional third quarter results.

Earlier this week we published the results of the California home prices, Texas home prices , Florida home prices surveys. Later in the week, we published the Massachusettes home prices survey data, the New York home prices survey data, the New Jersey home prices survey data, the North Carolina home prices survey, the Illinois home prices survey the Georgia home prices survey data, the Colorado home prices survey data, the Virginia home prices survey and the Arizona home prices survey.
Today we are releasing the Pennsylvania home prices survey.
Pennsylvania home owners, like their counterparts nationally, think their homes are worth more than their Realtors’ recommended listing price. Forty-two percent of Pennsylvania home owners think their homes should be priced 10-20% higher than their Realtors recommend vs. 38% nationally (see question 2).
Pennsylvania home buyers believe homes are over priced with only 4% believing that prices are fairly valued vs. 20% nationwide. Thirty-eight percent of Pennsylvania home buyers believe homes are priced 10-20 more than they should vs. 30% of home buyers nationally. (see question 3)
Pennsylvania Realtors are not optimistic about the direction of home prices with 42% believing they will decrease in the next six months, vs 31% who so believe nationally (see question 6).
Realtors in the Keystone state gave President a low approval rating: 37% vs. 42% nationally. Just 8% of Pennsylvania Realtors “strongly approve” of President Obama’s performance vs. 20% nationally, while 46% of Pennsylvania Realtors “strongly disapprove” of Obama’s performance vs. 40% nationally (see question 9).


Earlier this week we published the results of the
In the 


